Top
Latest News/Happenings
Make a comment
Latest Comments Help with writing
letters
5/13/04 - The opposition
effort was NOT SUCCESSFUL!
The vote occurred today and the Pinnacle Project was unanimously approved
by the Board.
Our Texas State Representative Corbin Van Arsdale and Lewis Hill of
Ravensway spoke in opposition.
The developer brought 10 people to speak in favor of the project.
Click here to submit
your comments
Click here to see our comments
5/10/04 - See the complete
TDHCA Board Book (493 pg., 3.4MB PDF)
This book summarizes all of the current projects up for vote Thursday May
13th
For the voting Board to review. WOL's part begins on page 210.
5/2/04 - See Steve Ford's (the developer) response
to our request
4/30 - See the White Oak Landing Final Input to
theTDHCA
3/11 cSee the March 10 Transcript
See the Developers Market Survey
THE
PETITIONS COLLECTION PERIOD IS OVER!
If you left your eyeglasses on the sign-in table at the March 10th
meeting, we took them to the Millsap office.
1/25/04 - PROPOSED
MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENT
There's a new sign on Huffmeister Road, just south of the bayou,
indicating plans for development of a new apartment complex in association
with the TDHCA.
The new sign reads:
NOTICE TO PUBLIC
PROPOSED MULTIFAMILY
RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY
Pinnacle Apartments, L.P. had made application to the Texas Department
of Housing and Community Affairs for the issuance of Private Activity
Exempt Bonds and Tax Credits for the development of a proposed
multifamily residential rental community Pinnacle Apartments to be
located in the approximately 10500 block of Huffmeister Road, Houston,
Harris County, Texas 77065. The development community will be
comprised of 248 units on 15.1841 acres.
There will be a public hearing to receive comments on the proposed
development.
Date: March 10, 2004, Time: 6:00pm to 9:00 pm
Location: Millsap
Elementary, 12424 Huffmeister Road, Cypress, Texas 77429
William D. Henson with HFI Pinnacle Developers, L.L.C. located at 5405
John Dreaper, Houston, Texas 77056 and telephone number is (713)
334-5808
For information contact Robbye Meyer with the
Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs, 507 Sabine, Suite #
700, Austin, Texas 78701 or by telephone at (512) 475-2213 or by email
at rmeyer@tdhca.state.tx.us. |
Note: The email
address on the sign is wrong. The correct address is
robbye.meyer@tdhca.state.tx.us.
Related
Links:
Website of TDHCA
Latest TDHCA Newsletter
Governing Board
2004 Low Income Housing Plan (PDF - 3.01MB)
Top Latest
News/Happenings Make a comment
Latest Comments
Help with writing letters
Check back in this area for Updates.
01-26-04 - The public
hearing noted above is not listed on the TDHCA website
calendar of
public meetings. Perhaps they haven't posted the full notice there yet.
01-26-04 -
Notice: The residents of the
Ravensway Community have formed a group of neighbors interested in this
new development and are hosting an informational meeting. All are
invited to attend the meeting to be held on Wednesday, February 11th at
7pm the Ravensway Community Center at
12716 Jarvis Road, Cypress, TX 77429.
Directions: From Hwy. 290 go north on Huffmeister Rd. crossing over
Fleur-de-Lis Drive. Turn right on Cypress N. Houston. Turn
left on Timberlake Dr. Turn left on Jarvis Rd. Turn right by
the basketball courts.
1-28-04 - The WOL
Board of Directors discussed this matter at their Board meeting Tuesday
1/27. Our representative at AMI is looking into this matter with other
neighborhoods who have been near these developments in the past for
guidance on how to address this.
02-01-04 - Here is a
developers description
letter (130 KB PDF) of the proposed
property, received by WOL HOA..
02-09-04 - The
developer builds it and then it's managed by Orion Real Estate Services
Inc.. They have similar affordable housing developments existing all
over town. The nearest is Sugar Creek near Sam's on West Road (if you want
to see what one looks like). Or visit
http://www.ores.com and see # 34 under Property Tour - Texas.
02-12-04 - The
February 11 meeting was attended by nearly 200 residents. Meeting notes
will be posted here soon. At the meeting Mr. Lewis Hill announced
the creation of a web domain named
WWW.CYFAIR.INFO and an email address
INFO@CYFAIR.INFO to use as the focal point for the research and
committees.
02-13-04 - The public
meeting is now listed on the TDHCA website
calendar. So, here is the official notice of the
Public Meeting. A description of these bonds and related
meetings is here.
02-13-04 - Here are
some 2-11-04 Meeting Notes PDF
| DOC compiled by Pete Tevlin,
please email any
corrections noticed, I can update it.
02-13-04 Here is the
opposition petition sheet
PDF |
DOC. Here is an additional
Handout PDF |
DOC sheet (and a small version
PDF |
DOC to save paper ) to give to
those who sign the petition with a reminder of the March 10th meeting and
asking them to contact their public officials with their opinion.
02-15-04 - Area
Neighborhood HOA Board members - take note... For your HOA to be
recognized as a valid entity to make presentations at the public meeting,
register with the City of Houston in the next week or so! Here's
the form: A side benefit to filling out this form is you will receive
monthly update emails listing all business licenses and building permits
issued.
2-25-04 - Pete received an email from Robbye Meyer containing
clarification and corrections to my notes from of the February 11th
meeting, as follows:
From: Robbye Meyer [robbye.meyer at tdhca.state.tx.us]
Sent: Wednesday, February 25,
2004 3:00 PM
To: 'whiteoaklanding at
yahoo.com'
Cc: 'Brooke Boston'; 'Robert
Onion'
Subject: Clarifications
Mr. Tevlin,
I was reading some of the notes on your neighborhood website and I would like
to clarify a few mis-statements and answer a couple of unanswered
questions.
Question: What is the radius for
notification of area homeowners?
The radius is whatever the local zoning notification states. If
local zoning notification is 500 feet then it is 500 feet. If there
is not a local zoning notification then it is 1000 feet.
Statement: Texas has put in protections to
prevent detrimental projects from being built without notice.
The notification process was not put into
to place to notify the public of "detrimental projects" being built.
The notification process was created to solicit public input from the
community.
Statement: SB 264 gives valid voice to
organizations registered with the Secretary of State and the City of
Houston. SB 264 states the
organization must be registered with the
County or State. The
Department requested developers be more due diligent and request
organizations that are listed with city clerks.
Statement: The Texas Bond Review
Bond makes the final decision to approve this project.
This is not necessarily a true statement.
Under the TBRB rules for 2004, TDHCA is an "Exempt" issuer in Tax Exempt
Mortgage Revenue Bond issuance. The TDHCA Board is responsible for
financial feasibility, housing policies/issues and community input and the
TBRB is responsible for the financial feasibility of the bonds. Some
transactions do not have to be approved by TBRB.
There will be a transcript recorded at the
public hearing on March 10, 2004 and a copy of that transcript will be
given to the TDHCA Board for their review in making their decision.
Robbye G. Meyer
Multifamily Bond
Administrator
(512) 475-2213 (voice)
(512)00 475-0764 (fax)
2-25-04 - See a
summary of what we’ve learned and advice we’ve received
PDF |
DOC - Pete
3-4-04 - Updates: Many
petitions sheets are coming in. Thanks to all getting out there and
involving the people!
The
status web
site about these projects in the area that Bob Kendrick mentioned Feb.
11 is online now.
We've received more good advice from a
knowledgeable source, click on and read this
DOC.
3-5-04 - I spoke to Colleen Gilbert at Corbin
Van Arsdale's office today. I told her I opposed the project and would be
getting the petitions to her for review. She said Corbin is presently out
of the country and she'd attend the Wednesday meeting. Look for her and
let her know how you feel about this project!
3-8-04 -- I received a letter overnight from
Pinnacle Apartments L.P.:
RE: Proposed 248-unit
apartment community for the elderly... See my
notes below regarding this. Kim
3-10-04 - As is
noted in the letter,
here is the newspaper posting (from 3-8-04) containing income levels:
NOTICE TO PUBLIC Pinnacle Apartments, L.P. is making an application
for Housing Tax Credits with the Texas Department of Housing and Community
Affairs for the Pinnacle Apartments, 10500 block of Huffmeister Road,
Harris County. This new development is an apartment community comprised of
248 units of which 100% of total will be for tenants with incomes less
than 60% of the area's median income. For a family of 1 those income
levels are $25,620. For a family of 2 those income levels are $29,280. For
a family of 3 those income levels are $32,940. For a family of 4 those
income levels are $36,600. The total restricted income percentage of the
Development is 100% of total. The number of units and proposed rents (less
utility allowances) for the subject property's tax credit units are: 56 1
Bedroom Units for $604 104 2 Bedroom Units for $721 88 2 Bedroom Units for
$828 If awarded credits, this development would be ready for occupancy by
approximately August 2005. For more information on this notice, please
contact Pinnacle Apartments, L.P., c/o Dwayne Henson, 1800 Bering Drive,
Suite 501, Houston, Texas 77057, at (713) 334-5808. For information, see
www.tdhca.state.tx.us .
Legal Notices
Location: TX Date:
3/8/2004
Source: Houston Chronicle
3-10-04 - I received a revised letter
overnight from Pinnacle Apartments L.P.: It's rates seemed to go up
but actually the utility allowance amount went down so the net increased!
See table and see full letter attached
PDF
1-7-04 TDHCA Application |
3-8-04 Pinnacle Letter |
3-10-04 Pinnacle Letter |
Rent: Gross minus Utility Allowance |
Rent for 1 bedroom =
$612-$58=$554 |
Rent for 1 bedroom =
$686-$82=$604 |
Rent for 1 bedroom =
$686-$65=$621 |
Rent for 2 bedroom =
$732-$72=$660 |
Rent for 2 bedroom =
$823-$102=$721 |
Rent for 2 bedroom =
$823-$81=$742 |
Rent for 3 bedroom =
$612-$87=$756 |
Rent for 3 bedroom =
$951-$123=$828 |
Rent for 3 bedroom =
$951-$97=$854 |
Number of units and ratios |
64 1BR, 112 2BR, 72 3BR |
56 1BR, 104 2BR, 88 3BR |
56 1BR, 104 2BR, 88 3BR |
3-10-04 -
Pete's Letter for the meeting
Blank
Letters to Representatives.doc
Blank
Envelopes.doc
3-11-04 - Last
night's TDHCA held Public Meeting was eventful. Between 300-400
residents attended. A testament to the concern this issue has caused
and the peoples determination to disallow this project to alter the area's
housing situation.
Ms. Robbye Meyer began the meeting and explained about the TDHCA and then
detailed the Pinnacle proposal line by line. See these handout sheets from
TDHCA: Handout1.pdf
Handout2.pdf The
meeting was recorded and is to be transcribed. [Pete asked Robbye for a
copy of it when it's completed, she estimated 2 weeks. I'll post it here
when received.] The main information points received at this meeting is
that the Public Comment Deadline is 5:00pm on April 30th, 2004 and the
TDHCA Board meeting (the vote) is scheduled for May 13, 2004.
Many (about 25) residents spoke during the
comments section of the meeting with a multitude of reasons against these
apartments voiced: Schools crowded already, buses are crowded too. The
lack of need for affordable housing here and many, many other informed and
passionate statements were presented. No one spoke for the project during
the comments period.
Kim Tevlin spoke for the White Oak Landing
Community with this statement:
I’m President of the Home Owners Association in White Oak Landing.
I have spoken to and received petition signatures from a very significant
majority of the residents of my community. We strongly oppose awarding the
Private Activity Exempt Bonds and Tax Credits for the development of
Pinnacle Apartments. I present 921 petition signatures and there will be
more to come!
Citing the fact that we're
a community off homes, Pete Tevlin asked if this project was a legitimate
use of public funds. He mentioned
a
letter he had handed out detailing his opinions about the project and
the meeting. He also mentioned this web site and the need for anyone
opposed to the project to contact their elected officials and and others
in positions of authority to ask for their stated opposition also.
After the comments period
ended, Sally Gaskin from the project developer spoke saying a number of
positive things about the project. She said they, the developer, prefers
to speak to smaller groups and to reply to email, letters or fax so they
can clearly answer all questions they receive. Their contact info is on:
Pinnacle-Handout-3-10-04.pdf
Later, when some folks wanted to ask them a
question, they deferred to Ms. Gaskin's statement and did not respond. A
bunch of people decided to leave right then.
3-10-04 - If you left your eyeglasses on the
sign-in table at the March 10 meeting, we have them.
Click here or call us at 2819557345.
3-11-04 - Colleen Gilbert from
REPRESENTATIVE CORBIN VAN ARSDALE's office called Kim
Tevlin to say that Mr. Van Arsdale recognizes our concerns with this
project and is going to write a letter of opposition in our behalf!
3-12-04 - Our efforts are working! Our
closest and first public official has joined us in opposition of the
apartment project ! Our many thanks to Rep. Corbin
Van Arsdale for his support in writing
this letter!
Neighbors are encouraged to call (281) 469-9130 and let him know you
appreciate his support!
3-13-04 - Kim received a response letter from
Pinnacle (to the questions she sent them on the 10th). Steve Ford explains
their reluctance to speak at the public meeting.
Click here to read it.
3-15-04 - Kim received an invitation letter
for everyone in the area from Pinnacle to visit an open house at
Sugar Creek apts. Tuesday evening:
From: J Daniel
Sent: Sunday, March 14, 2004 7:51 PM
To: whiteoaklanding at yahoo.com
Subject: Open House Invitation - Pinnacle Apartment
We would like for the community to visit our neighboring community to
see first hand the type of property, amenities and community services
our properties offer to the community. Would you please circulate the
attached invitation on your website.
Thank you,
Jana Daniel Asset Manager H.F.I. Management 713-334-5514 713-334-5614
EMAIL: jana at rresford.com
Read the invitation here:
PDF |
DOC
Notes: I've been kind of lax
updating things during spring "broke" - I'll try to catch up... Pete
Thanks for all of the messages of support and appreciation!!!
3-26-04 - On 3-17-04 I accepted the
invitation and visited the
Sugar Creek Apartments
on West Road to look at what the development would be like. Jana Daniel
who invited us, and Tammy Fair who works at the complex for Orion Real
Estate Services showed me around.
I have to admit I was truly impressed with
the complex. It is one year old and it looks it, new. I was shown a unit
that had been rented out and re-prepared for occupancy and it was clean
and the units contained some extras like fans, washer/dryer hookups and
the kitchens had many cabinets and a pantry. Each unit had a one-car
garage. We walked around the place and the grounds were well kept,
mowed and landscaped and had both a large playground and pool. The office
area had a laundry and small exercise room a computer room with a dozen
PC's and a little library type of room for doing homework. There is an
instructor there on a regular schedule. They related many positive
points about the complex, (some of which I've covered below in notes of a
March 8th conversation with Jana) and, in their favor and in all fairness,
these are not unlivable places at all. In short, the developer expressed
their interest in seeing this complex kept up and occupied long term for
the benefit of both themselves, the lessees and the community. Pete
Tevlin
Pinnacle will gladly make arrangements to
meet with anyone interested or concerned about this project.
Just ask Jana or anyone @ 713-334-5514.
3-26-04 On 3-22-04 Kim got a call from Phil
Owens with House
District 135, Representative Gary Elkins
office and he mentioned some very negative and threatening letters he has
received. Mr. Owens read some of the letters and they sounded pretty
heavy-handed. He said threats and negativity are not as effective as
reasoned and researched requests.
He said Mr. Elkins will oppose the project
but he is not the rep. for the people he has received letters from.
Click on his district number below to see his representative area, (it's
south of FM1960).
The main point here regarding public
representatives (not the TDHCA Board members, go ahead and write all
of them): Find who your representative is by one of the methods below and
only write him (or her), not other people's representatives.
3-24-04 - We received a call today from
Colleen Gilbert that Rep. Van Arsdale will attend the May 13th hearing in
Austin! Wow!
3-26-04 - We received this
letter yesterday
from the Lieutenant Govenor of Texas,David Dewhurst
This letter raises two new items: Another
Public Meeting regarding these projects (not necessarily Pinnacle) is
scheduled downtown April 21st @ 6pm and a different TDHCA contact person
is listed.
3-26-04 - We received this
letter today from the
Attorney General of Texas, Greg Abbot.
Many thanks to Mr. Abbot and Mr. Dewhurst
for their response and support!!!
3-26-04 - We received this email today from
Robbye Meyer in response to our email requests after the March 10th
Meeting:
I have attached the transcript in the email
and a copy of the expenses for the market study. Once I receive payment
for the market study I will mail it to you. Please provide your physical
mailing address so I can get it to you and send a copy of the expense
sheet with you payment so accounting will notify me when the payment is
received.
Here is
that Transcript: As received (hard to read):
DOC
& here it is reformatted for easier reading
PDF
Anyone want to volunteer to extract all of
the public "questions" from the meeting transcript and put them into one
document for sending to the developer "in written form" as they desire?
Email us
4-12-04 - WOL Newsletter article submitted:
APARTMENT PROJECT STATUS By: Pete Tevlin A good bit of effort spent on
opposition to this project resulted some positive advancement. Our
petition currently has over 1686 signatures. The section of the WOL web
site devoted to this project information has received over 1700 hits. We
have the support of our Texas State Representative Cobin Van Arsdale to
this cause. He has written a letter to the TDHCA Board and is going to
attend and speak on our behalf at the May 13th meeting in Austin, before
the approval decision vote. Neighbors are encouraged to call (281)
469-9130 and let him know you appreciate his support! If you wrote letters
to your public officials and representatives, thank you. If you didn't
write letters then perhaps you were to busy or this issue didn't concern
you. If the proposal is rejected, you can be thankful to your neighbors
who did take action. If it's approved, we can only resolve to use what
we've learned to better oppose the next nearby proposal which will
probably follow soon after. On May 13th we'll see if the voice of the
people was strong enough to be effective. A response we've received from
Rep. Van Arsdale indicates that our appearance in Austin to make
statements at the TDHCA meeting are significantly more effective than
letters alone. If you feel strongly about this issue, please make plans to
go to Austin on May 13th. The quantity of voices against the issue is what
matters most and even if you don't want to speak, by being signed in
there, you can defer your two-minute time slot to one of our other
speakers, allowing them more time to make opposition points. See the WOL
web site for much information on this issue.
4-15-04 - We received
the copy we requested of the
Developers
Market Survey. This is the document that the developer presents
as their basis for requesting approval. If you want to download and view
this document, it will take a while, I scanned all 220 pages and the PDF
file is 36MB. Anyone who wants to go through
this document and pick out the discrepancies, please email your findings
to whiteoaklanding@yahoo.com by the 10th of May. Thanks for your help.
4-20-04 - In case anyone is interested in the
"rules governing this issue", the
Full 2004 QAP is here, and a
FAQ
is here and the
condensed version is here.
4-26-04 - No one volunteered to do what we
requested above and Pinnacle hadn't taken any action so we excerpted the
questions and sent
this letter (49KB PDF) to Pinnacle.
4-30-04 - Well, we completed our
WOL input letter to the TDHCA (580KB PDF) and
turned it in before today's deadline. It may not be enough to do any good
but at least the voice of the people will be heard and may do some good.
5-1-04 - Steve Ford (one of the developers)
has written a response
(84KB PDF) to our request to answer the questions posed at the March 10th
meeting.
Check above for latest News and Happenings.
Top
Latest News/Happenings
Make a comment
Latest Comments Help with writing
letters
Check below for latest Comments & Actions
taken/reported.
Here
are ways to contact your public officials:
It is essential
that these officials are contacted with your viewpoint!
Blank
Letters to Representatives.doc revised 3-17-04
Blank
Envelopes.doc
revised 3-17-04
A sample letter from the Goss's:
DOC
A sample letter from Kim
(as HOA President):
DOC
A sample letter from the
Osburn's:
DOC
Want to add your letter to
the samples?
Click here to email it!
Patrick Krishock,
Acting Executive Director
State of Texas Bond Review Board
Clements Office Bldg., Suite 409
300 West 15th Street
Austin, Texas 78701
Dr. David Anthony
Superintendent of Schools
Cypress Fairbanks ISD
P.O. Box 692003
Houston, Texas 77065
The Honorable Steve
Radack
County Commissioner -
Precinct Three
Administration Building
1001 Preston, 9th floor
Houston, Texas 77002
http://www.pct3.hctx.net
Use this tool to find your
elected officials:
http://www.capitol.state.tx.us/fyi/fyi.htm
or select below...
HOUSE
DISTRICT 126 -
REPRESENTATIVE PEGGY HAMRIC
District Address: 7915 FM 1960 West #325
Houston, TX 77070
District Phone: (281) 890-1200
HOUSE
DISTRICT 130 -
REPRESENTATIVE CORBIN VAN ARSDALE
District Address: 12777 Jones Road - Suite 175
Houston, TX 77070
District Phone: (281) 469-9130
HOUSE
DISTRICT 132 -
REPRESENTATIVE WILLIAM A. "BILL" CALLEGARI
District Address: 1550 Foxlake Drive, Suite 114
Houston, TX 77084
District Phone: (281) 578-8484
HOUSE
DISTRICT 130 -
REPRESENTATIVE CORBIN VAN ARSDALE
District Address: 12777 Jones Road - Suite 175
Houston, TX 77070
District Phone: (281) 469-9130
HOUSE
DISTRICT 135 -
REPRESENTATIVE GARY ELKINS
District Address: 9601 Jones Road,
Houston, TX 77065
District Phone: (832) 912-8380
Texas U.S. Representative:
CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT 8 -
CONGRESSMAN KEVIN BRADY
State District
Offices
CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT 31 -
CONGRESSMAN JOHN R. CARTER
State District
Offices
Texas State Senator:
SENATE
DISTRICT 7 -
SENATOR JON LINDSAY
District Address: 15531 Kuykendahl Suite 251
Houston, TX 77090
District Phone: (281) 583-1011
Fax: (281) 444-0189
Email:
pat.wisnjewski@senate.state.tx.us
The Texas Bond Review Board
makes the final decision to approve this project.
per Robbye Meyer:
This is not necessarily a
true statement. Under the TBRB rules for 2004, TDHCA is an "Exempt"
issuer in Tax Exempt Mortgage Revenue Bond issuance. The TDHCA Board
is responsible for financial feasibility, housing policies/issues and
community input and the TBRB is responsible for the financial feasibility
of the bonds. Some transactions do not have to be approved by TBRB.
It is essential
that these members of the Board or their alternates are contacted with
your viewpoint:
Board
Members and Alternates
http://www.brb.state.tx.us/brbpages/agency/alternate.html
Governor
Rick Perry, Chair (512) 463-2000 P.O. Box 12428 Austin, TX 78711-2428
Alternate: Ed Robertson (512) 463-2000
Lieutenant Governor
David Dewhurst (512) 463-0001 P.O. Box 12068 Austin, TX 78711-2068
Alternate: Blaine Brunson (512) 463-0001
Comptroller of Public Accounts
Carole Keeton Strayhorn (512) 463-4000 P.O. Box 13528 Austin, TX
78711-3528
Alternates: Lita Gonzalez (512) 475-1125
Debbie Cartwright (512) 463-3106
Speaker
of the House of Representatives
Tom Craddick (512) 463-1000 P.O. Box 2910 Austin, TX 78768-2910
Alternate: Don Green (512) 463-1000
Appointed Sept.
14, 2001
Ms. Elizabeth "Beth" Anderson
Vice President
Science Applications Int. Corp.
3612 Asbury
Dallas, Texas 75205
214-521-6189 Phone
214-521-4305 Fax |
Appointed Sept.
14, 2001
Mr. Shadrick Bogany
TDHCA
P.O. Box 13941
Austin, Texas 78711
512-475-3934
512-472-8526 (fax) |
Appointed Sept.
14, 2001
Mr. C. Kent Conine, President
Conine Residential Group
5300 Town & Country Blvd., Ste. 190
Frisco, Texas 75034
972-668-6600 Phone
972-668-6700 Fax |
Appointed Sept.
14, 2001
Mr. Vidal Gonzalez,
TDHCA
P.O. Box 13941
Austin, Texas 78711
512-475-3934
512-472-8526 (fax) |
Appointed
November 7, 2003
Mr. Patrick R. Gordon, Attorney At Law
Gordon & Mott, PC
4695 North Mesa, Suite 100
El Paso, Texas 79912
915-545-1133 Phone
915-545-4433 Fax
|
Appointed Sept.
14, 2001
Mr. Norberto Salinas, Mayor
City of Mission
900 Doherty
Mission, Texas 78572
956-580-8668 Phone
956-580-8669 Fax |
Top Latest News/Happenings
Make a comment
Latest Comments Help with writing
letters
Comments
that have been entered on the web form above:
Name: Karl
Volkmann
Neighborhood: White Oak Landing
Email:
Opinion: Oppose
Date: Tuesday, January 27, 2004
Time: 09:25:56 AM
Comments:
Great, more urban sprawl. Maybe we can get another car dealership,
fast food joint, or possibly even another dry cleaners shoehorned in on
Huffmeister. What's next a Metro bus route?
Name: Franz
Acosta
Email: franzacosta at yahoo.com
Subject: PROPOSED MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENT
Neighborhood: White Oak Landing
Opinion: I'm just seeking information
Date: Tuesday, January 27, 2004
Time: 12:52 PM
Comments:
Would it not be a hazzard to those who would occupy the apartment
buildings that the nearby airport appears to have airplanes using that
path upon takeoff and landing? It is only my perception that the airplanes
seem to follow that path and then turn towards the bayou behind WOL until
they are at a safe altitude. This avoid having to fly directly over a
residential area upon takeoff and landing. How would these apartments also
affect the property value of those who live in WOL? Thank you, in advance.
Name: Pete
Tevlin
Email: whiteoaklanding at yahoo.com
Subject: Development location, Metro route?
Neighborhood: White Oak Landing
Opinion: I'm adding new information
Date: Tuesday, January 27, 2004
Time: 02:19 PM
Comments:
Hello, The sign is located south of the bayou nearest 290, across from
the Oak Cliff subdivision; not by the bayou near the doughnut shop.
Regarding Metro expansion, page 12 of their pre-election
flyer boasts "Over 1,000 New Route Miles". I'm not sure of the
authenticity, but I was told some time ago that Metro's future expansion
plan includes extending Fallbrook alongside our neighborhood and through
the airport area to 290 to allow more auto routes and providing bus
service to this area. Maybe someone reading this would know whom to
contact to check the validity of this.
Name: Kim
Tevlin
Email: whiteoaklanding at yahoo.com
Subject: Letter to Board
Neighborhood: White Oak Landing
Opinion: I'm adding new information
Date: Sunday, February 01, 2004
Time: 11:25 PM
Comments:
If you want to see the developers description of the proposed
property, see this
letter
(130 KB PDF) I received from the Texas Dept. of Housing and
Community Affairs.
Name:
Email:
Subject:
Neighborhood: White Oak Landing
Opinion: I do not favor it
Date: Tuesday, February 03, 2004
Time: 07:58 AM
Comments:
Name: Lewis
Hill
Email: lhill100 at hotmail.com
Subject: developement
Neighborhood: Ravensway
Opinion: I'm adding new information
Date: Tuesday, February 03, 2004
Time: 08:15 AM
Comments:
If I were you I would be a lot more concerned than the airport being
too close to the proposed apartments. First the Texas Department of
Housing works with low to very low income families. There are issues of
another several hundred cars on 290 each morning. the drainage of the
property in to the white oak bayou will increase. How about Millsap
if your kids go there it is over crowded now with the apartments they
build across from Millsap and these how many more kids will it bring.
While most people in this income bracket are just trying to make a living
and provide for their family, it does bring with it an undesirable
element. I live a couple miles from the proposed site and I am worried, If
I lived almost across the street I would be frantic. Call the number in
the article for the housing Dept. Tell them you are opposed to this
project, go to the meeting in Ravensway on Wednesday the Feb 11th,
learn more and go to Millsap on March 10th and tell you don't want this.
But remember low income people do need a place to live you can't just
oppose low income housing, you will be seen in the wrong light. All you
have to say is you opposed the project period.
Name: Nathan
Gaskill
Email: gaskin.1 at earthlink.net
Subject: Apartment Development
Neighborhood: White Oak Landing
Opinion: I do not favor it
Date: Tuesday, February 03, 2004
Time: 05:47 PM
Comments:
Today, I talked to Robert Pendergraft, a lawyer that has dealt with
prior unwanted developments. I faxed him the info I had on the 10500
Huffmeister plan as well as told him our wishes not to have the project go
forward. He said the public meeting scheduled for March 10, 2004, 6pm-9pm,
at Millsap Elementary, 12424 Huffmeister was very important for as many
interested parties as possible to attend and let them know every aspect of
our concerns about the project.
To attend, you need to
call Robbye Meyer at the Texas Department of Public Housing and Community
Affairs, 507 Sabine, Suite #700, Austin, TX 78701 at (512) 475-2213 or
email at
rmeyer@tdhca.state.tx.us. If you are not able to attend, you can write
or fax
(512) 475-0764
and express your views.
I also faxed a request
to receive copies of all plans and info concerning the development to the
developer, William Henson. When I talked to him he asked me to fax him a
written request and he would be more than happy to comply by personally
bringing the package to me. I will keep you informed of any further
information I receive concerning this project.
Name:
Email:
Subject:
Neighborhood: White Oak Landing
Opinion: I'm just seeking information
Date: Wednesday, February 04, 2004
Time: 06:29PM
Comments:
In reference to the Ravensway Group meeting, Feb. 11th is
Wednesday..not Sunday.
Is the meeting Sunday
the 15th or Wednesday the 11th?
Thank you.
Name: Pete
Tevlin
Email: whiteoaklanding at yahoo.com
Subject: Date of Ravensway meeting
Neighborhood: White Oak Landing
Opinion: I'm adding new information
Date: Wednesday, February 04, 2004
Time: 08:44 PM
Comments:
Thanks for pointing out the day error. The Ravensway meeting is on a
Wedesday night, February 11th. See you there!
Name: joe
beshara
Email: jebeshara at hotmail.com
Subject: Re:NOTICE TO PUBLIC
Neighborhood: White Oak Landing
Opinion: I'm adding new information
Date: Monday, February 09, 2004
Time: 12:05 AM
Comments:
I found some more information on other similar developments. Click on
the links:
http://www.tdhca.state.tx.us/pdf/hf/uwrep/03449.pdf
http://www.tdhca.state.tx.us/pdf/hf/uwrep/03466.pdf
Name: Estella
Cavazos
Email: ecavazos at reliant.com
Subject: New Devewlopment
Neighborhood: White Oak Landing
Opinion: I do not favor it
Date: Monday, February 09, 2004
Time: 08:19 AM
Comments:
I totally oppose this development..Where exactly is 10500 Huffmeister
?
Name: Mark
Email:
Subject: Multifamily Development. - Public Notice
Neighborhood: White Oak Area
Opinion: I do not favor it
Date: Monday, February 09, 2004
Time: 11:47 PM
Comments:
FYI - While surfing the web - Protest information and outcome related
to a similar project involving State issued Private Activity Bonds and Tax
Credits for LOW INCOME HOUSING in the Katy Area for the proposed project
Greenland Apts. by Trammell Crow can be found on
http://www.houstonarchitecture.info/haif/index.php?showtopic=259
http://www.barkersridge.org/News/02news.htm#Greenland
http://www.barkersridge.org/News/03news.htm
As presented on the above website an excerpt is as follows: "During the
October 3 meeting, speakers from the Mayde Creek community clearly made
the case that there was no need for the Greenland Housing Project, and
that the community's infrastructure (transportation, employment, medical)
was clearly absent to support the needs of low-income residents. Without a
market driver for the housing project, and with no infrastructure to
support its residents, there is no compelling reason "why" such a project
represents the best use of public funds - especially if this project has
any potential for threatening the quality-of-life attained by the
community's residents. Saturday's Houston Chronicle report attempts to
skirt this key issue of "why" the project is being planned, to one of
placing our community in a defensive position. The arguments as to "why
not" are not valid because the social/economic drivers behind the project
do not exist. This is not a debate as to whether property values will go
up or down. This is an issue of the misuse of public funds for private
gain, all at the risk to the community that exists"
Name: Pete
Tevlin
Email: whiteoaklanding at yahoo.com
Subject: Letter to another neighborhood in prior similar situation
Neighborhood: White Oak Landing
Opinion: I do not favor it
Date: Tuesday, February 10, 2004
Time: 01:58 AM
Comments:
Thanks Mark. I sent an email tonight to some involved members of the
Barkers Ridge neighborhood listed above to ask for their experienced
assistance. Any advice received will be useful and appreciated. 10500
Huffmeister is just south of the bayou that's near the auto repair place.
The proposed development would be across from Oak Cliff Place. Tell your
neighbors to get involved and attend Wednesday night!!!
Name: Domingo Villarreal
Email: mingo146 at yahoo.com
Subject: PROPOSED MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENT
Neighborhood: White Oak Landing
Opinion: I do not favor it
Date: Tuesday, February 10, 2004
Time: 01:45 PM
Comments
The values of our homes and our family lifestyles have been sadly
jeopordized since homeowners have opted to RENT their homes, more evident
in the last few years. Having a LOW INCOME HOUSING Project come into the
area, will definitely bring our values right down a spiral... We must do
what we can to stop this project from moving forward or just throw our
hands up and let them destroy our neighborhood! See y'all at the meeting
Wednesday the 11th.
Name: Walle Engedayehu
Email: walle_engedayehu at pvamu.edu
Subject: propsed multyfamily housing
Neighborhood: White Oak Landing
Opinion: I do not favor it
Date: Tuesday, February 10, 2004
Time: 09:22 PM
Comments
It is in deed very alarming to learn of the possibility of an
apartment complex being built in a nearby lot where our homes are located.
Certainly, the value of our homes will drastically be affected, possibly
making our neigbohood unattractive to used home buyers in the future. We
all envisage a future that will bring better returns from our investments,
and our homes are our investments. It is a proven fact that any time you
have an apartment complex coming to a residential neighborhood like ours,
the value and quality of the latter suffer to the extent that homeowners
may sell their property ahead of time to avoid future losses on their
investments. It in light of this possibility that I am opposed to the
proposed multyfamily apartment residence that is being planned just across
from our subdivision. I encourage everybody to voice your concern
immediately, and we must collectively take the action necessary to prevent
it. Thank you.
Name: Daniel Lacayo
Email: daniellacayo at sbcglobal.net
Subject: imformation
Neighborhood: White Oak Landing
Opinion: I do not favor it
Date: Tuesday, February 10, 2004
Time: 09:39 PM
Comments
Please keep me inform about the apartment project and meetings thank
you.
Name: jamal nasir
Email: jnasir at houston.rr.com
Subject:
Neighborhood: White Oak Landing
Opinion: I do not favor it
Date: Wednesday, February 11, 2004
Time: 08:58 AM
Comments
Name: Patrick
Email: pandrews at houston.rr.com
Subject: No Apartments!
Neighborhood: White Oak Landing
Opinion: I do not favor it
Date: Wednesday, February 11, 2004
Time: 10:51 AM
Comments
What is the position taken by the Oak Cliff residents? I believe the
argument that the existing infrastructure may not support low-income
housing residents is valid in our case. Of course, this may be a prelude
to public transportation project of which we are not aware. How can we
rally Stone Gate, Cole Crossing, and the other subdivisions to our cause?
Even the Cy-Fair Chamber should be involved in this matter.
Name: Marvin Johnson
Email: daphaney52
Subject:
Neighborhood: White Oak Landing
Opinion: I do not favor it
Date: Wednesday, February 11, 2004
Time: 01:56 PM
Comments
Name: Fritz Lang
Email: fritz at langgang.com
Subject: Multifamily residential rental community
Neighborhood: White Oak Landing
Opinion: I do not favor it
Date: Wednesday, February 11, 2004
Time: 06:37 PM
Comments
They should just call them what they are, apartments. I lived close to
apartments before I moved here. My children had their bicycles stolen and
we found the thieves in the nearby "multifamily residential rental
community". Everyone put locks on your back yard gates and floodlights in
your yards.
Name: Darin Carlson
Email: carpoole at academicplanet.com
Subject: Home Owners Associations need your help!
Neighborhood: Ravensway
Opinion: I do not favor it
Date: Thursday, February 12, 2004
Time: 12:02 AM
Comments
First off, thank everyone who showed up at the meeting in the
Ravensway Community Center. MORE PEOPLE NEED TO GET ACTIVELY INVOLVED IN
OPPOSING THIS DEVELOPMENT!!!!!!!!
All citizens of our community of homeowners have plenty to lose and
therefore need to actively seek quantifyable evidence to back up their
opinions against this development from being allowed to progress any
further than the posted notice to the public. It needs to be presented
quickly because 6:00 p.m March 10th is now only a month away!!!
We need everyone to search for information concerning how this proposed
construction will disrupt property values at the present time and into the
future, impact jobs in the area, lead to need for additional public works
and services improvements ($$$taxes$$$???), affect quality of life in the
community, impact of flood control measures, loss of land that could be
utilized for more appropriate development or preservation, impact on
schools, impact on road congestion, do we really need this multifamily
dwelling project?, etc... The more information the better. Massive amounts
of accurate data and opposing opinions can be mailed to TDHCA, Senator
John Lindsay, State Rep Corbin Van Arsdale, etc. When it comes time for
presentation of opinions at the public hearing scheduled for 6:00 p.m.
March 10th, it'll have to brief and to the point. We need everyone's help
for organizing and procuring research data, procuring opposition petition
signatures, providing legal council where logical, etc. I strongly oppose
this development project and any like it in this local community.
Again, we need more help to better procure data to support arguments
against this development. It would be in conflict and incompatible with
the local community at large. Perhaps the developer is promising to
produce management for 30 years for this project, but what if they go
under (Enron ring a bell?). Who steps in to cover a low revenue generating
housing complex. I'm quite sure most intelligent investors wouldn't, and
who can trust the Texas legislature to fill in the required help. The same
ones that aren't concerned with your home resale value on the open market,
right?
The logical conclusion is that hopefully the local taxpayers have to be
legally able to step in and clean up a potentially abandoned housing
complex in the future. Easier said than done. Remember, low income
generates low revenue. Low revenue is bad for business function, budget
capability, and survival. Once the structure is complete and/or
circumstances change (such as laws, business capabilities, etc) the local
homeowners will have to deal with whatever is built on the surrounding
lands, and become frustrated with having had more to lose. Can you imagine
how difficult it'd be for Paul Bettencourt or his successors to collect
back taxes on 15.1841 acres of potentially lost cause property in the
future, even if it's 30 years away (or sooner). Too many if(s). Would the
inhabitants of this development be as inclined to preserve, maintain, and
improve (yeah, right!) this property with the same conviction that
homeowner taxpayers do with their own, hard earned property? NOT!
This development is presumed to introduce an increase in demand on public
works and services such as additional ($$$) law enforcement officers, fire
fighters, EMS personnel, school district teachers and support staff,
social services workers, medical facilities (within walking distance),
flood control structures, street and sewage maintainance, libraries,
sidewalks, etc. What about a present lack of affordable, efficient public
transportation services and infrastructure to support pedestrian
inhabitants who cannot afford or operate automobile transportation? Is
that to be a concern?... Who's going to pay for all this? Do you think the
low revenue generated from the development is going to be capable to do
these tasks? What about market value of your home located nearby this
development? Will it rise in a manner comparable to that if there were no
development like this in the area? Probably not! Community perceptions
will change with the completion of such a development I'm sure. Keep in
mind that market values of neighboring properties (home, land, commercial)
tend to strive for equalibrium over time as this is the desired tendency
of most home appraisers, even those that work with HCAD. Do you think that
housing developments like this will actually lead to improved property
values in this area? Probably not!
Name:
Email:
Subject:
Neighborhood: White Oak Landing
Opinion: I do not favor it
Date: Thursday, February 12, 2004
Time: 02:15 PM
Comments
Name:
Email:
Subject:
Neighborhood: White Oak Landing
Opinion: I do not favor it
Date: Thursday, February 12, 2004
Time: 02:58 PM
Comments
Name: Pete Tevlin
Email: whiteoaklanding at yahoo.com
Subject: Ravensway meeting summary
Neighborhood: White Oak Landing
Opinion: I'm adding new information
Date: Friday, February 13, 2004
Time: 01:00 AM
Comments:
I've added a summary of the
Feb 11th meeting at Ravensway. I also
placed the petition forms and a handout there.
Name:
Email:
Subject:
Neighborhood: White Oak Landing
Opinion: I do not favor it
Date: Friday, February 13, 2004
Time: 06:57 PM
Comments
Name: Charla Lucky
Email: charlal at ev1.net
Subject: Apartment
Neighborhood: White Oak Springs
Opinion: I do not favor it
Date: Friday, February 13, 2004
Time: 06:53 PM
Comments
Name: Darin Carlson
Email: carpoole at academicplanet.com
Subject: additional recommended focus
Neighborhood: Ravensway
Opinion: I'm adding new information
Date: Friday, February 13, 2004
Time: 09:51 PM
Comments
I received an email from a good friend whose had a lot of experience
covering many similar housing project matters. Here is an excerpt of some
of his recommendations.
<<< You'll have a hard time winning with
arguments affecting your property values or 'better use for that land.'
Don't focus on that (so much), and don't focus on how low income is bad
for the area. Having covered many of these battles (very, very few of them
ending with residents winning out), you have to stay focused on a few key
points.
1. INFRASTRUCTURE - Roads unable to handle
it, bridges, ditches, water/sewer.
2. POLICE - Contract deputies needed for your neighborhood and very few
patrols designated at this point.
3. FIRE - Enough fire equipment nearby to handle emergency of that large
scale of more than 250 units.
4. FLOODING - Runoff, runoff and runoff pouring into your area.
5. Stores, businesses to support such an influx of low income.
When you're addressing lawmakers or the state
agency, you need to stay focused on why this project is doomed to fail,
and is a bad investment of public bond money. Anything you can cite about
high vacancy rates in other apartments near you, or any other reason you
can give about why it's a bad investment for the state is very, very
important. People (tend to) lose these battles because they don't talk the
right language to these people. They focus all their energy on 'here's why
this project is bad for ME.' You have to tell the public officials and
this project developer why it's a poor choice for a location and a bad
investment. Talk about how they'll be putting unwitting tenants in harms
way in some fashion (any of the above ideas).
I THINK THE BEST ARGUMENT IS MADE WHEN YOU
SHOW THAT THESE HUNDREDS OF NEW TENANTS ARE BEING PUT IN DANGER AND SO ARE
EXISTING NEIGHBORS LIKE YOURSELF BECAUSE OF (AT LEAST) ALL OF THE 5 ABOVE
FACTORS.
You have to use key buzz words that get
politicians uptight. Remember, the goal here is to make them want to chose
somewhere else where there are less problems and less resistance. They
need to go where it's easy. The best evidence I've seen presented at these
things deals with comparable projects. I've seen people do really well
picking apart specific plans and why it won't work in this particular
case. In other words, something like "Look at Diagram X here, an even
smaller project, that had failures as you can see here. Obviously, this
project is larger so we could expect failures on a larger scale."
>>> Now I know that we have many points to
focus on in terms of research and organization, but time is of the essence
and it is rapidly running out. At the very least, we need to consider that
if we don't try aggressively hard to win this battle, it'll be much more
likely that they'll try again just a mile down the road, making the
situation even worse. Perhaps it'd be wise to invest in legal counsel to
assist us in preparing useful information relevant to defeating this
proposed housing project...
Name:
Email:
Subject:
Neighborhood: White Oak Landing
Opinion: I do not favor it
Date: Saturday, February 14, 2004
Time: 12:14:02 PM
Comments
Name: shari strange
Email:
Subject: petition
Neighborhood: White Oak Landing
Opinion: I'm just seeking information
Date: Sunday, February 15, 2004
Time: 01:23:53 PM
Comments
How is the petition being collected? Should we download the page from the
internet? Is this one any different than the one at the meeting? Do we
need to circulate the petition in our subdivision? If time in running out-
as it was said many times throughout the comments on the website- I think
we should hurry up and get the petition going by going door to door.
Perhaps we could assign someone per street- how are we going to get the
entire neighborhood to sign this petition? Is there a central
point/location where we can sign or where we can deliver a signed
petition? In additon- I was wondering if it is possible to use our home
owners association money to provide legal counsel for us in this manner? I
am not happy about this proposed development.
Name: Judy Norrholm
Email: rnorrholm at houston.rr.com
Subject: Planned Development at 10500 Huffmeister
Neighborhood: Oak Cliff Place
Opinion: I do not favor it
Date: Sunday, February 15, 2004
Time: 08:59:53 PM
Comments
I don't believe our school, who are currently sending our children out
to portable buildings, can handle any more students. I am not in favor of
paying more taxes for additional schools. There are already new apartments
down Huffmeister by Millsap. They are putting more up down Huffmeister by
CVS. And then there are more going up behind the new Eckerds on 1960.
Enough already! Judy
Name: hwilke at ev1.net
Email: Harold Wilke
Subject: proposed apartments on Huffmeister
Neighborhood: White Oak Springs
Opinion: I do not favor it
Date: Monday, February 16, 2004
Time: 11:11:37 AM
Comments
I am very concerned as to what affect these apartments would have on
the value of existing property and on the quality of life. We have put out
a great deal of money to move out here because it seemed to be a quiet and
safe place to be. These apartments could change all that. Thank you,
Harold and Carolyn Wilke 10818 White Oak Creek Ct. Cypress, TX 77429
Name:
Email:
Subject:
Neighborhood: White Oak Landing
Opinion: I do not favor it
Date: Monday, February 16, 2004
Time: 04:24:08 PM
Comments
Name: Brian & Valle Wilson
Email:
Subject: Proposed Low Income Apartment Building
Neighborhood: White Oak Landing
Opinion: I do not favor it
Date: Tuesday, February 24, 2004
Time: 09:48:14 AM
Comments
Another apartment building???? We moved to this area to escape the
issues you have living in urban areas. The effects of another apartment
building would be detriment to our neighborhoods. They drive property
values down and typically come with elements that most are trying to
avoid. We do not want this in our area.......
Name: Pete Tevlin
Email: whiteoaklanding at yahoo.com
Subject: Clarifications I received from TDHCA
Neighborhood: White Oak Landing
Opinion: I'm adding new information
Date: Thursday, February 26, 2004
Time: 07:47:17 AM
Comments
I received an email from Robbye Meyer with
the TDHCA detailing corrections to this web site.
Name: Pete Tevlin
Email: whiteoaklanding at yahoo.com
Subject: Summary of important points
Neighborhood: White Oak Landing
Opinion: I'm adding new information
Date: Thursday, February 26, 2004
Time: 08:04:46 AM
Comments
I've put together a summary of what we’ve
learned and advice we’ve received. See above.
Name:
Email: samnpatti at houston.rr.com
Subject: More Apartments
Neighborhood: Enchanted Valley Estates
Opinion: I do not favor it
Date: Tuesday, March 02, 2004
Time: 04:26:13 PM
Comments
Increased traffic, and reduction of property values are not a good
sign. I was not happy to see the apartments and new housing developement
rise around Millsap. I hope they had planned for this growth when they did
the work on flood prevention on Cypress Creek.
Name: Pete Tevlin
Email: whiteoaklanding at yahoo.com
Subject: Summary of important points
Neighborhood: White Oak Landing
Opinion: I'm adding new information
Date: Thursday, March 4, 2004
Time: 11:54:46 PM
Comments
I've added more news and an advice letter we've received. Good points!
See above.
Name: misty scalise
Email: misty.scalise at cfisd.net
Subject: multi-family housing project
Neighborhood: cypress mill park
Opinion: I do not favor it
Date: Friday, March 05, 2004
Time: 11:59:36 AM
Comments
Name: Pete Tevlin
Email: whiteoaklanding at yahoo.com
Subject: Action needed!!
Neighborhood: White Oak Landing
Opinion: I do not favor it
Date: Friday, March 05, 2004
Time: 09:10:17 PM
Comments
Has anyone gotten letters of opposition from the elected officials on
record at the property? This is the most pivotal piece. If we can get them
to write letters of opposition (and speak against it) and we have a large
turnout Wednesday (which it is pretty obvious that we will) we may be able
to get the developer to recognize that this is not beneficial to this
community or potential residents of the project.
Do you want to have an impact in repelling
this project or just sign a sheet of paper and let someone else do
everything (maybe nothing)? Take action NOW, take on one or some of the
action items mentioned above, call or write and ask your elected officials
if they'll write an opposition letter TODAY. Express your viewpoint on any
or many of the good reasons for this not being built noted on this page
and in the attachments. If one proposal is denied then the odds of others
being proposed and passing are reduced. .
Thanks! Pete
Name: Kim
Tevlin
Email: whiteoaklanding at yahoo.com
Subject: Letter from Pinnacle Apartments L.P.
Neighborhood: White Oak Landing
Opinion: I'm adding new information
Date: Monday, March 08, 2004
Time: 10:09:04 AM
Comments
I received an overnight letter from Pinnacle Apartments L.P.:
RE: Proposed 248-unit
apartment community for the elderly...
Name: Kim Tevlin
Email: whiteoaklanding at yahoo.com
Subject: Pinnacle Conversation notes
Neighborhood: White Oak Landing
Opinion: I'm adding new information
Date: Monday, March 08, 2004
Time: 01:35:00 PM
Comments
I called Robbye Meyer at TDHCA to ask about this letter. She said that
she hasn't received a revised application from Pinnacle. They are free to
change their application before the March 15th deadline. I asked if she
does receive one to please bring it to the meeting Wednesday night. She
said she would.
I called the Pinnacle Apartments L.P. office
(who sent me this letter) asking for J. Steve Ford, who was busy, so I
asked for Robert Henson who was in a meeting. I finally spoke to Jana
Daniel and she looked it up and said the "for the elderly" text was an
error. It came from the text on a previous letter she was writing that was
regarding a different development. She'll send me a corrected letter; I'll
post it when it arrives.
We discussed these other differences between
the original Bond application and the letters we received 3-8 & 3-10:
1-7-04 TDHCA Application |
3-8-04 Pinnacle Letter |
3-10-04 Pinnacle Letter |
Rent: Gross minus Utility Allowance |
Rent for 1 bedroom =
$612-$58=$554 |
Rent for 1 bedroom =
$686-$82=$604 |
Rent for 1 bedroom =
$686-$65=$621 |
Rent for 2 bedroom =
$732-$72=$660 |
Rent for 2 bedroom =
$823-$102=$721 |
Rent for 2 bedroom =
$823-$81=$742 |
Rent for 3 bedroom =
$612-$87=$756 |
Rent for 3 bedroom =
$951-$123=$828 |
Rent for 3 bedroom =
$951-$97=$854 |
Number of units and ratios |
64 1BR, 112 2BR, 72 3BR |
56 1BR, 104 2BR, 88 3BR |
56 1BR, 104 2BR, 88 3BR |
Jana explained that the difference in rent
amounts is because new figures for median income for the area are released
every March calling for revision. These amounts are not set by Pinnacle,
but buy the HUD published median income rent restrictions.
The differences in number of unit ratio is
because in doing their studies the saturation of 1 & 2 bedrooms is greater
than the 3 bedroom so it was changed based on the needs of the area.
Kim: I stated our opposition because of the
schools being filled, there is no public transportation to Huffmeister and
there are many apartments being built in this area already.
Jana: The schools generally do not experience
a great increase because of these properties because people move from the
area homes into the apartments so the numbers may shift but won't
necessarily increase.
I (Kim) didn't have the presence of mind to
challenge this statement, perhaps we can ask at the public meeting.
Jana: Many of our properties are on bus lines
but the prospective residents will have vehicles. There are many
restaurants and a mall in the area - there's much retail that can hire the
residents. They are trying to provide good quality housing for people who
don't make as money as more fortunate people.
Kim: I asked how long they will maintain the
property, can we expect junk cars and the like?
Jana said they are long term holds - 30 years
- the developer is in there for the long haul. They have never sold one of
their communities, we cannot even sell the property until 20 years pass.
We maintain the same standards as conventional housing. Look at our
properties, Quail Chase is 5 years old. We oversee the management
companies we use to manage the properties and have contracts with towing
companies who sticker, for example if there are abandoned cars. We get
right on it. Conventional properties may also have a car on jacks but the
question is how quickly do we respond. We respond just as quickly if not
more quickly that others do. We maintain our properties and keep them from
becoming unsightly. We don't build a product like that or manage that type
of community.
We take care of these communities as if we
are going to live there. I am in charge of maintaining the asset and I
monitor drive them day and night, I walk the properties and see that they
are kept up.
These are not like conventional where they
build it quick and poorly then turn them - only in it for the money. We
hold them so we build a good product.
Go visit any of our communities and see a
unit that has been vacated and is open for rent. It is fully cleaned and
prepared like new condition for the next resident. We are there to
maintain the asset.
Kim: I asked what the value of the property
is expected to be when it is complete (the bond request is for 15 million
dollars).
Jana: I do not have this information, but it
will be available at the meeting.
People are afraid of the "affordable" word
but it's not necessarily a negative thing. Just because someone makes
$25-35K doesn't mean they won't make a good neighbor. They have to follow
strict guidelines and if they don't we ask them to move. We are not
there to ignore things. Drive our properties, they are in good condition
and well maintained.
I apologize for the error in the letter. I'll
send a correction. I'll be at the meeting Wednesday. I invite anyone
concerned with this property to please call me and discuss it.
713-334-5514.
Kim: I thanked her for the information.
Name: Kim Tevlin
Email: whiteoaklanding at yahoo.com
Subject: New Letter from Pinnacle Apartments L.P.
Neighborhood: White Oak Landing
Opinion: I'm adding new information
Date: Wednesday, March 10, 2004
Time: 02:04:54 AM
Comments:
I received a revised letter from Pinnacle. It's rates seemed to go up
but actually the utility allowance amount went down so the net increased!
See table above and see full letter attached
PDF
Name: Kim Tevlin
Email: whiteoaklanding at yahoo.com
Subject: New Letter from Pinnacle Apartments L.P.
Neighborhood: White Oak Landing
Opinion: I'm adding new information
Date: Thursday, March 11, 2004
Time: 011:14:24 AM
Comments: I sent an email to Pinnacle/Sally Gaskin at the address
on their meeting handout. It bounced so I dug up a different email address
that worked, She replied with two emails and neither answered the
questions I had asked but promised to do so soon:
Date: 3/11/2004 11:12:12 -0600
From: "Sally Gaskin"
CC: pinnacle@rresford.com
Subject: RE: Pinnacle Apartment Public Meeting Feedback & Questions
Kim,
I don’t understand why your email to
pinnacle at rresford.com bounced back last night. That is a new email
address that we recently set up for this project. However, we have
tested it and have had no problems receiving emails. Please try it again
and let me know if you are still experiencing problems.
I am preparing a response to the questions
you have posed which should be coming to you soon. However, I wanted to
respond to the issue of the email address immediately. Also, I want to
thank you and Pete for staying after the meeting last night to talk with
us. We sincerely want the opportunity to work with the community to
provide a more indepth look at our commitment to quality developments
and long-term community partnership. We feel the best way to do that is
not to "tell" about that commitment, but to show you what we have done
and let you make your own conclusions. We may not have handled the
situation last night in the best possible way, we are learning through
this process as well. However, we are sincerely interested in providing
you and the community with as much information as you desire. In
addition, we will meet with you individually or in groups at your
convenience.
As I mentioned in our recent telephone
conversation, I am working on a more detailed response to the questions
you posed in your email, however, I wanted to get this brief response
out. Please do not hesitate to contact me.
Thank you,
Sally Gaskin
Office: 713-334-5514
Cell: 713-882-3233
Date: 3/11/2004 18:33:39 -0600
From: "Sally Gaskin"
To: "Kim"
Subject: List of affordable apartment complexes developed by
Dwayne Henson & Steve Ford: The list
Name: Chris Edwards
Email: cnedwards56 at hotmail.com
Subject: I oppose it!!!
Neighborhood: Tower Oaks Meadows
Opinion: I do not favor it
Date: Friday, March 12, 2004
Time: 02:20:46 PM
Comments
Just wanted to show my opposition to the plan. I have written my
representatives. Let me know if there is anything else I can do.
Name: Kim Tevlin
Email: whiteoaklanding at yahoo.com
Subject: A New Letter from Pinnacle Apartments L.P.
Neighborhood: White Oak Landing
Opinion: I'm adding new information
Date: Saturday, March 13, 2004
Time: 02:04:54 AM
Comments: I received a response letter from Pinnacle (to the
questions I sent them on the 10th). In addition to answering the questions
I posed i.e. Steve Ford explains their reluctance to speak at the public
meeting.
Click here to read it.
Name: Kim Tevlin
Email: whiteoaklanding at yahoo.com
Subject: A invitation from Pinnacle Apartments L.P.
Neighborhood: White Oak Landing
Opinion: I'm adding new information
Date: Monday, March 15, 2004
Time: 09:02:14 AM
Comments: I received an invitation letter for everyone in the
area from Pinnacle to visit an open house at Sugar Creek apts. Tuesday
evening:
From: J Daniel
Sent: Sunday, March 14, 2004 7:51 PM
To: whiteoaklanding at yahoo.com
Subject: Open House Invitation - Pinnacle Apartment
We would like for the community to visit
our neighboring community to see first hand the type of property,
amenities and community services our properties offer to the community.
Would you please circulate the attached invitation on your website.
Thank you,
Jana Daniel Asset Manager H.F.I. Management
713-334-5514 713-334-5614 EMAIL: jana at rresford.com
Read the invitation here:
PDF |
DOC
Name: Bryan Nickel
Email: accordtdn at excite.com
Subject: Oppose Community Apartment
Neighborhood: White Oak Landing
Opinion: I do not favor it
Date: Tuesday, March 23, 2004
Time: 06:17:49 PM
Comments
I have read all the comments posted by each individuals and the
opinions on pinnacle developments. I truly appreciate all of those who are
taking the time and effort to fight against the community apartment
development. Your work does not go unseen or unheard. Continue your fight
for what is right, both for our neigborhoods and our residents. I support
you guys all the way.
Name: Shawn & Christina Osburn
Email: christinaosburn at yahoo.com
Subject: Pinnacle Proposal Opposition
Neighborhood: White Oak Springs
Opinion: I do not favor it
Date: Thursday, March 25, 2004
Time: 01:55:40 PM
Comments
My husband and I both attended the meeting and mailed letters to all
representatives on March 16th. I have not heard anything back yet but urge
each of you to tell your neighors to write their letters. Thanks to the
Tevlin's for putting the wealth of information together for us. The
templates really helped. I have also emailed my sample letter. Thanks!
Christina Osburn 14011 White Oak Gardens Drive Cypress, TX 77429
832-237-4661 (home) 713-297-7085 (work)
Name: Chuck and Amy Ridley
Email: aehastings at yahoo.com
Subject: Housing Project
Neighborhood: White Oak Landing
Opinion: I do not favor it
Date: Sunday, March 28, 2004
Time: 06:58:05 PM
Comments
Name: Lewis Hill Email: lewis.hill at sbcglobal.net Subject: Pinnacle Apartments Neighborhood: Ravensway Opinion: I do not favor it Date: Saturday, May 15, 2004 Time: 01:10:08 AM
CommentsI am the president of the Ravensway Saracen Park Home Association and happy to say through the boy scouts have become friends with Pete and Kim Tevlin. I went to Austin to comment to the TDHCA board partly due to our neighborhood concerns and partly becasue I knew Pete was obligated elsewhere and could not go. If you don't know how much Pete and Kim have done to keep this developement out you should know it has been a ton of work. I commend them. I am going to post here part of my article for our community newsletter
On the 13th of May I went to the Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs board meeting in Austin. One purpose of the meeting was to decide the fate of the low-income apartments on Huffmeister. Our state representative Corbin Van Arsdale appeared in person to voice his opposition. After 2 hours of other business they got to the section where they would go over the different Apartments they were going to approve.
The first two complexes one in Houston and one in Plano were passed after about two minutes of discussion. Neither of these had any opposition, both had letters of support from different state representatives. Next was the Pinnacle apartment group. When I signed up for my turn to speak the secretary told me there were 12 other people signed up to speak. I was fired up for surely these would mostly be opposing speakers. So you can imagine my extreme disappointment to find it was 12 for the project and myself the lonely opposition.
The women from the board described the property and listed the numerous letters of opposition and made reference to Mr. Van Arsdales comments of the morning. I was allowed to speak, I made a point to mention all the different concerns. The one main point I made was that on Huffmeister within a 1 ½ mile radius of the proposed site there are 900+ apartment units in 4 different complexes. Of these 3 take the section 8 program which is for low income subsidies. And only about 250 to 300 of these apartments are occupied leaving 600 to 650 vacant. In the board action request the TDHCA staff said that there are within walking distance of the site major shopping and employment opportunities. I pointed out to the board that this was not true and as I had previously stated there is no public transportation or even sidewalks on Huffmeister. Further more the closest grocery store was over a mile and this same grocery store was the biggest employer in the immediate area. In addition there are no medical facilities or clothing type of stores any where on Huffmeister. I also told them that young adults who have grown up in the area are currently holding the service level jobs the residents of the Pinnacle would work at.
After I spoke the Developer was up next he told them that the meeting at Millsap had turned in to a lynch mob and it had to be shut down. This was not the case a total lie the meeting ended normally. He told them that although the Cy- Fair School Board had been neutral until last week when they signed a contract to provide programs at Pinnacle so they now supported the project. If this is true we need to elect new School board members. As a matter of fact we have a School board member who lives in Ravensway, be sure to thank that member when you see them. The developer brought in finance people and engineers and even a tenant of one of their developments. The tenant was a real tear jerker he told how he and his wife and two kids one of whom had cerebral palsy had been given the opportunity for a decent place to live due to the developer.
Any way long story short on of the members of the THDCA board a Shadrick Bognay who supposedly lives in Missouri City. Started spouting off about how he had personally walked to property and it was a wonderful site and how dare the opposition to say that the residents who not have cars. That the opposition was trying to keep lower income people from having a reasonable place to live and there were tons of jobs in the area.
Then the board voted and it was 7 to none to approve the project. I was so mad I couldn’t see straight. These people who are appointed by the governor had the audacity to sit there and tell us how to run our community. The more I thought about it the madder I got, but not at the TDHCA because you can’t get mad at ignorance. But mad at our elected officials who turned a deaf ear to the constitutes who voted them in office. There were literally thousands of petition signature and a bunch of letters and emails and faxes and Corbin Van Arsdale a state representative who came and spoke against it.
Where was Steve Raddick? Where was Jon Lindsey? Where was the Cyfair School Board? They could care less!
I say vote them out of office! America is a great place to live, these elected officials are there to serve us. When they forget how they got there it is time for them to go away.
Name: Danny R. Wesolick Email: dlcmwes at
yahoo.com Subject: Developers Comments.... Neighborhood: Ravensway Opinion: I do not favor it Date: Tuesday, May 18, 2004 Time: 10:54:32 AM
CommentsRegarding the Developers comments:( i.e school over crowding) and the comment made by the developer "Steve whats his name". It is easy for you to have the answers and you have done this many many times before. I am very surprised that the voices heard by the people in the meeting from our community at Millsap on 3-10 and in this community were not considered. No doubt in my mind exists that there was overwhelming opposition to this project from the second the sign was put up on Huffmeister.
I found it strange that during this meeting, an open forum, the developer did not speak to the people to answer the questions presented. Only a clerical person I believe from the developer spoke very very briefly at this meeting.
In hindsite, I believe the forum was a waste of time with no response to questions from the developer. The conclusion was that he would answer questions only in writing from the forum. Our voice was not heard and I strongly criticize those who voted for this development.
It's easy to cast a vote when it's not your neighborhood.
In conclusion, why was the Pinnacle plan passed when so many strongly opposed it ?
My conclusion is that it is not possible that this communities voice was considered.
Name: Christina & Shawn Osburn Email: christinaosburn
at yahoo.com Subject: One last chance Neighborhood: White Oak Springs Opinion: I do not favor it Date: Tuesday, May 18, 2004 Time: 10:16:01 PM
CommentsI want to first of all thank the Tevlin's for their tireless efforts to stop the Pinnacle apartments. I benefited from their time well spent and used the letter templates. I finally received about 6 response letters out of 26 mailed. Most were responses stating that they could do noting for me and pointed me to TDHCA for assistance. I was so releived when Mr. Van Arsdale said he was on our side! The last response received was on May 17th from the Cy Fair ISD who claimed a nuetral position but thanked me for my input. Their letter was received 2 days AFTER the proposal was approved. My letters were mailed in March! How long does it take to respond to a letter? How many letters of opposition were responded to AFTER the approval? I also received a letter from Governor Rick Perry who acknowledged my concerns and CC'd TDHCA requesting them to investigate my concerns and respond back to me and Mr. Perry. I never received a response from TDHCA. Regarding the meeting held downtown on April 21st - I emailed a letter to the person in charge at the TDHCA and indicated that I wanted my opposition noted at the meeting. I stressed that a 6:30pm meeting downtown for someone who works 8:30am to 5:30pm off the Beltway & Briar Forest with daycare closing at 6:30pm in Cypress was difficult to attend on those of us who work hard to pay for our current homes. I never received a response to my email. I had Lasic surgery on May 7th and was not able to attend the meeting in Austin. Thank you Mr. Hill for going to bat for everyone. After reading your letter, I can not wait to vote.
The one thing that I have a question about and what might be our last chance is - has anyone brought up wildlife issues to save the land? There are deer, birds and other animals on the land who will be forced out. I have seen deer that have been hit at the entrace of White Oak Springs so I know they are in there. I read that there is an appeals process so maybe this could be our last chance. I am willing to help out in any way possible.
Name: Email: Subject: Neighborhood: White Oak Landing Opinion: I favor it Date: Monday, October 18, 2004 Time: 09:06:50 AM
Comments
Name: teresa Email: babysavannag18@yahoo.com Subject: section 8 housing Neighborhood: White Oak Landing Opinion: I'm just seeking information Date: Thursday, February 17, 2005 Time: 03:46:58 PM
CommentsMy name is Teresa Escobar and I am looking for information about section 8.Would you please contact me at my email sight and tell me about any information you in oak cliff.If there is a number I can call.
Name: Pete Tevlin Email: Subject: Here's a link to the new 5/05 QCP guidelines Neighborhood: White Oak Landing Opinion: I'm adding new information Date: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 Time: 02:36:18 PM
Commentshttp://www.tdhca.state.tx.us/pdf/lihtc/04-QCPPacket.pdf
Name: KenS Email: ksr49@sbcglobal.net Subject: TDHCA problems Neighborhood: Westbourne, Caynon Gate & Northpoint east Opinion: I'm adding new information Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2005 Time: 02:50:18 PM
CommentsYou are not alone folks, we are also fighting a TDHCA project in Van Arsdales district, a project we call the WCA or Willow Creek Apartments. We beat the TDHCA board and the developer on the notification issue once just to have him reapply again May the 4th of this year. Many of us believe that the timing of the reapplication was due in large part to the TDHCA board’s cozy board/developer relationship! Regardless of the cause, we will continue the current fight until we beat them a second, third and fourth time if necessary! Remember this: Conmen and shysters always profit, when honest people of good faith do nothing!
Please check our webpage www.oppose-wca.com for a heads up on our past activities.
YOU should
add your own thoughts, actions and comments to this page!
Click here to here to add a Message to this forum.
If you just entered new information, press Refresh or F5 to view it
above.
5-13-04 - Are you looking down here for the
writings of others who share your upset over approval of the project? You
should realize that the time for you to have taken action was previous to
today, not just browsing to see what everyone else (very few) were doing!
Kim and I personally put in a ton of time and
effort on this issue, but we apparently couldn't do enough to overcome the
enormous bureaucracy of this department of our government and the
developers who know and operate the system. We sincerely appreciate the
voices and offers of support and appreciation by a few folks and learned a
lot in the process!
If you really cared about this issue and took
the time to write your elected officials, write them again and express
your disappointment with their inaction (except Corbin; do write to thank
him!). If you didn't act or only signed a petition then sat back to watch,
give yourself partial credit for the project's approval and look forward
to approval of the other five or six proposed projects along the
Huffmeister corridor.
There may still be something you can do in the
future; the TDHCA has an appeals process to protest
the vote and we welcome anyone to take it on. You could also express your
dissatisfaction at the polls!
Well, on with our lives again!
Pete & Kim Tevlin
Top Latest
News/Happenings Make a comment
Latest Comments
Help with writing letters
You are one of
neighbors and friends that have visited this page, which was last updated
on
Monday March 18, 2013
|